In vivo fertilization is the most basic biological process where fertilisation occurs between sperm and egg inside the female body. Its existence is the result of natural conception, and it is different from that of in vitro fertilisation, in which fertilisation takes place outside the body in a laboratory. This article talks about the concept of in vivo fertilisation, how the process takes place, facilitated in vivo approaches, and the difference between in vitro and in vivo fertilisation.
In vivo fertilisation is basically natural conception where the sperm meets an egg inside the body. When someone asks what in vivo fertilisation is, the simplest answer one can give is natural conception. The fertilisation happens internally and without medical intervention.
In vivo fertilisation is a part of the future assisted fertility techniques, where some stages of fertilisation or embryo development take place in the woman’s body. Nevertheless, conception through natural in vivo fertilisation is still the predominant biologically normal way of reproduction.
Natural in vivo fertilisation follows a well-coordinated biological sequence. Here is how the process happens step by step:
Each month, a woman’s ovary releases a mature egg. This egg journeys to the fallopian tube, where it stays for about 12–24 hours.
During sexual intercourse, millions of sperm are ejaculated. Just a few of these sperm manage to enter the cervix, uterus, and finally the fallopian tubes.
When sperm find their way to the fallopian tube and are still lucky enough for the egg to be alive, one sperm penetrates the egg. What follows is fertilisation, the moment of which takes place naturally in the woman’s body.
Next, the fertilised egg - the embryo - is getting its cells divided while it is on its way to the uterus.
After 5–6 days, the embryo attaches itself to the uterine lining; thus, the very first stage of pregnancy is marked.
This entire sequence defines natural in vivo fertilisation, which is entirely dependent on the body’s hormonal balance and reproductive health.
Although such techniques are less frequently used than IVF, assisted in vivo methods are attracting more attention. These methods can allow fertilisation and early embryo growth to occur in the woman’s body.
Some examples include:
A tiny medical device that contains eggs and sperm and is inserted into the vagina for fertilisation and early embryo development prior to the transfer to the uterus.
Intracervical insemination (ICI) is a form of artificial insemination, wherein sperm is inserted near or at the cervical opening rather than the uterus. ICI is the closest artificial insemination technique to the natural insemination process.
Sperm is introduced straight into the uterus; however, fertilisation is still done naturally in the fallopian tubes.
These methods of assisted in vivo fertilisation are more natural than the ones used in vitro, although couples with severe infertility may not be able to use them.
The main difference between in vitro and in vivo fertilisation is mainly dependent on the location of the fertilisation of the egg. The following table provides a summary of the main differences:
| Features | In Vivo Fertilisation | In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) |
|---|---|---|
| Fertilisation Site | Fertilisation of eggs takes place inside the body | Fertilisation of eggs takes place outside the body |
| Level of Intervention | Minimal or no medical procedures | High medical involvement |
| Suitable For | Couples with healthy fertility | Couples facing various infertility issues |
| Control Over Process | Limited control | Highly controlled conditions |
| Common Methods | Natural conception, IUI, INVOcell | IVF, ICSI |
Both processes aim to achieve pregnancy, but the difference between in vitro and in vivo fertilisation lies in how and where fertilisation takes place.
For many couples with infertility, IVF is preferred due to its higher success rates and precision.
The choice to either use in vivo fertilisation or in vitro fertilisation depends on the analysis of the health state, age, fertility profile, and medical history of the couple. The fertilisation process in vivo depends on the natural body process; therefore, it can only be used for couples who have no fertility problems. Consequently, IVF offers greater control to people who struggle to conceive - they are able to track the development of the embryos, pick the healthiest ones, and, as a consequence, the success rates will be increased.
In vitro fertilisation is also helpful in assisting couples who have issues like the blockage of tubes, low sperm count, hormonal imbalance, or where infertility is unexplained. And because each couple has its own medical profile, the choice between in vivo and in vitro methods should not be a matter of guessing.
A fertility expert can help determine the most suitable option after evaluating reproductive health, tests, and overall medical needs. Getting advice early from a specialist makes the process of deciding easier and leads to better pregnancy outcomes.
In vivo fertilisation is a natural biological process where fertilisation occurs inside the body, while IVF takes place in a laboratory. The distinction between in vitro and in vivo fertilisation allows a couple to make the correct choice regarding their fertility pathways. In case you need a personal evaluation or guidance from any professional, the specialists of Indira IVF are easily accessible to direct you to the right fertility way.
In vivo fertilisation is a natural conception, meaning that the egg and sperm meet and fuse in the woman's reproductive system, which is typically the fallopian tube
In vivo is a process that happens naturally inside the body, whereas IVF fertilises eggs in a lab, and then the embryos are transferred to the uterus for pregnancy.
In vivo fertilisation may only work for couples who do not have significant infertility problems, while couples with medical infertility will generally be prescribed treatments like IVF.
What are examples of in vivo fertilisation? Natural conception, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and INVOcell-assisted fertilisation are examples of processes where fertilisation still takes place in the woman's body.
Which is more successful - in vivo or in vitro? In vitro fertilisation tends to be more successful because it offers a controlled fertilisation and embryo development environment, thus making it applicable to a broad spectrum of infertility problems.
Natural in vivo fertilisation does not necessitate any kind of intervention, while assisted technologies like IUI or INVOcell do require the services of a medical professional, even though the fertilisation process occurs internally.